The death of the American dream

By Russell Friend

According to, if you’re earning less than $10.77 an hour, then you’re making less than your grandparents did back in the ’60s, when they were working a minimum wage job. The $1.60/hr they made in 1968 is worth $10.77/hr today.

With that in mind, it’s hard to deny the painful truth: Wages have decreased by over 32 percent since 1968 for 99 percent of Americans. The reason? A money and power grab by the top 1 percent, and the resultant income disparity that will eventually result in the elimination of the middle class. Raising the minimum wage to the levels of our grandparents would go a long way to helping those most in need.

Bootstrapping is what made America great. But ask any of the over 10 million working poor if hard work is enough to prevent them from living paycheck to paycheck, which, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, they are. The sad truth is that repressed wages have turned the American dream into a nightmare.

Couple this with the shocking fact that, according to The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation, over 47 million Americans lack any health care, while millions more are one check away from losing their coverage, and an ugly picture of our modern day American life cape begins to form. How did we get into such a predicament? Are we still the greatest country in the world?

According to the UC-Berkeley Department of Economics, since 2009, 95 percent of the income gains have gone to the top 1 percent, and that’s actually down from the 121 percent in gains they earned from 2009 to 2011. Odds are good that many of our grandparents will work until the day they die — their dreams died a long time ago.

This is what happens when people aren’t paid a living wage. Many of us face a similar fate if we allow this income disparity to continue unchallenged. The irony is that employees today are far more productive than they were back in the ’60s.

If we were to tie the minimum wage to production, it would currently be around $22/hr, according to MSN Money. From 1973 through today, technology and education have resulted in tremendous gains in worker productivity. Unfortunately, compensation hasn’t followed suit.

We face an uphill battle. Now that money is the driver behind free speech (e.g. Super PACs) the voices of the poor and middle class (i.e. you and me) have been nearly silenced by the roar of the 1 percent. They’re creating large swaths of low information voters who actually believe the half-truths being sold to them.

How many of you have heard about the job creators meme? It’s almost as ubiquitous as the socialized healthcare meme, and the compromised Canadian and British health care systems memes, which are false, by the way, as many of my Canadian friends will happily attest to.

According to, out of 141 countries, the U.S. has the fourth highest degree of wealth inequality in the world, trailing only Russia, Ukraine and Lebanon. The reason for this disparity is simple: Corporations are influencing legislation through lobbying efforts and Super PACs, and then reaping financial windfalls.

The more they win, the more everyone else loses. Months before their epic and well-documented collapse, Enron Corporation had three of their top officials secretly meet with then-Vice President Dick Cheney, who was heading the energy task force.

These officials were instrumental in crafting legislation that gave Enron and their ilk hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks and other benefits. How could such extreme corruption influence policy? Greed is green, and money is the great equalizer. Many former Enron employees, having lost everything, will be working until the day they die.

The first step is to raise minimum wage. The minimum it should be raised to is the levels of our grandparents, $10.77/hr. Ideally, I’d like to see it also reflect the vast gains in productivity, and would be happy with a minimum wage around $16/hr. It would instantly and drastically improve the lives of tens of millions of Americans.

However, the 1 percent club wants to horde all the money, and it has become even more obvious over the past decade. One of the greatest periods of economic growth occurred during President Clinton’s term, 1993 – 2000. This resulted in income growth across the board. The UC-Berkeley Department of Economics found that during this time incomes for the bottom 99 percent grew by over 20 percent. While still repressed, they weren’t backsliding.

However, from 2002 – 2007 incomes for the bottom 99 percent grew by a mere 7 percent, while those for the top 1 percent grew by almost 70 percent. This is, in large part, the result of policies enacted by the Bush administration — including sweeping tax changes that benefitted the top 1 percent.

Most of these were implemented after the Enron debacle, even though Enron executives had a hand in crafting the legislation.

Today, the 1 percent aren’t content with merely working in the background. The Koch brothers and Rupert Murdoch are bankrolling the tea party, and there’s no doubting the poisonous influence these Puppets of the Plutocracy have had on Washington. Tea party members were instrumental in shutting down the government as part of a bluff to undermine President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, because having over 47 million Americans living paycheck to paycheck and living without adequate health care isn’t unfair enough.

The bluff quickly unraveled hours after the Koch brothers, in a face-saving move, publicly stated that they weren’t behind the shutdown (nudge nudge, wink wink). Following this announcement, a rash of meetings ensued to resolve the crisis and limit the political fallout. But how does this affect you and me?

The influence the Koch brothers have had on our country has been devastating. Their meddling with renewable energy legislation, using Koch-supported think tanks and junk science, among other tactics, has resulted in the elimination of tens of thousands of jobs, higher utility costs and more pollution (not to mention the long-term effects of said pollution).

On the upside, the Keystone pipeline will create upwards of 50 jobs. According to, the Koch brothers have spent over $67 million from their family foundations to deny the existence and extent of global climate change, promote fossil fuel use, and undermine renewable energy legislation. But the most immediate impact has been the tremendous loss of jobs.

Today, thanks to the influence of big money on Washington politics, we’re being told and sold even less of the truth, while a new charade of morality carries on. Change starts by addressing income disparity.

I’m not talking about higher taxes. That’s a tough sell, though the tax rates during Clinton’s presidency didn’t affect economic growth, and in fact possibly helped to spur growth. Giving people a living minimum wage, one that’s adjusted for inflation, is the logical next step. And $16/hr would be a great starting point.

The regulations and policies being instituted today to address income disparity pale to those enacted during the New Deal (after the Great Depression). According UC-Berkeley Department of Economics, the result of the New Deal permanently reduced income concentrations until the 1970s, which is when this current run of income disparity started.

Coincidence? Until drastic changes are enacted to address this issue, income concentration will compromise economic stability, eliminate the middle class and kill the American dream for tens of millions. We’ll be left with a two-class society of excessive wealth and extreme poverty.

Unless we face this issue head-on, we may be witnessing the birth of America’s Plutocracy.

But there is some good news. On Tuesday, Nov. 5, the citizens of New Jersey and the city of SeaTac, Wash., voted to raise the minimum wage. New Jersey residents approved a $1 increase, which will raise minimum wage to $8.25/hr. The measure also contains an automatic cost of living increase.

The residents of SeaTac took a more progressive approach by voting to increase the minimum wage to $15/hr for hospitality and transportation workers in and near the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Proponents for SeaTac’s measure understand that bottom-up economics is a viable solution for boosting their economy and increasing consumer spending, while also reducing poverty and income concentration. The SeaTac measure also includes paid sick leave and tip protection.

These increases follow California’s $2 increase, which raises minimum wage to $10/hr. Connecticut and New York approved gradual increases, which will raise minimum wage to $9/hr. They’re steps in the right direction, but more could and should be done.

Could Ohio be next?