The Editorially Independent Voice of The University of Akron

The Buchtelite

The Editorially Independent Voice of The University of Akron

The Buchtelite

The Editorially Independent Voice of The University of Akron

The Buchtelite

Graphic courtesy of Liv Ream; movie flyer from IMDB
In defense of Skinamarink
By Liv Ream, Arts and Entertainment Editor • October 1, 2023
Alternative Spring Break 2023 volunteers in Washington, D.C. Courtesy of Natalie Mowad.
Applications open for Akron’s 2024 Alternative Spring Break
By Taylor Lorence, Correspondent • October 1, 2023
The Northern Cheyenne tribe and community walking the ancient Portage Path from Portage Path CLC to the John Brown Home during a previous years First Peoples Day event. Photo courtesy of Portage Path Collaborative.
UA Holds events in celebration of North American First People’s Day   
By Shananne Lewis, Online Editor • September 28, 2023
White swan on water during daytime photo - Free Uk Image on Unsplash
The Swan's Rapture: a poem
By Emily Price, editor in chief • September 27, 2023
Desperately Seeking an Amazon Fighter, sculpture by Kimberly Chapman
"Easy Prey" art exhibit on display at Myers School of Art
By Taylor Lorence, Reporter, Secretary • September 21, 2023
“On the left, there’s me at work! I received the New Student Orientation “Gold Standard” award alongside 
and at the same time as my friend Gillian.”
Courtesy of Connor VanMaele
Fall 2023 Print Edition: Going the Distance
By Connor VanMaele, Correspondent • September 19, 2023
L to R: Steve Horner, Heather Barhorst, Haley Kuczynski, Shawna Blankenship, Brynley Harris, Jessie Redwine at the Pop-Up Pantry. Image Courtesy of ZipAssist.
ZipAssist Holds Community Resource Fair Tuesday, September 19 from 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. in the SU 2nd Floor
By Shananne Lewis, Correspondent • September 18, 2023
Film critic Liv Ream and friend pose for photo (Image via Liv Ream)
My Barbie experience
By Liv Ream, Film Critic • September 17, 2023

A complaint about in-house speech competition

Written by: Katharine Powell

Dear Dr. Elizabeth Graham,

I would like to extend my congratulations in completing The University of Akron’s first in-house School of Communication Speech Competition. Hosting a project like this requires a tremendous amount of work and dedication from both the faculty and the students.

However, as a participant, there are a few concerns I would like to bring your attention.

As an Honors student, I am taking Honors Introduction to Public Speaking. In this course, I was taught how to properly prepare and deliver a persuasive speech. Structure was emphasized extensively. As organization and content were a significant component of the score, I had hoped to see more in the presentations given by my competitors.

According to Public Speaking and Civic Engagement, the assigned text for this course, proper organization of a speech includes an introduction including a thesis statement outlining the specific purpose of the speech, as well as transitions and a review or conclusion. Furthermore, being a competition for problem-solution persuasive speeches, the speeches were to appeal to ethos, logos and pathos using properly researched support and properly cited sources, as well as avoid fallacies of reasoning.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of the speakers failed to apply this information to their speeches. At the university level, especially for a competition, a certain level of proficiency is expected. However, these standards were not met.

Public Speaking and Civil Engagement goes on to address the ethics of public speaking. Although I am sure this was not done intentionally, far too many speeches were lacking credible sources. Many presentations were not cited properly, if at all. I would hate for the integrity of the School of Communication to be compromised by allowing the presentations of ill-supported and improperly cited sources. Plagiarism is grounds for expulsion from The University of Akron. Therefore, I suggest that the credibility and proper citation of sources be taken seriously.

In my Introduction to Public Speaking course, we were taught that effective communication is executed by remaining natural so as not to distract the audience from the information being presented. Therefore, I found the requirement of a PowerPoint to be contradictory.

The use of a visual aid is important in a persuasive speech, especially in regards to the call to action. Unfortunately, the vast majority of competitors used PowerPoint extensively, with many presentations including excessive audio and video. This turns the speech into a presentation.

As indicated by the title of the event, I was expecting to see properly executed speeches, not elaborate presentations. In class, we were taught that a simple picture to illustrate the main point is acceptable. We were also taught that providing a piece of informative material is an effective way to allow the audience to engage in our call-to-action. Although this method has been used in speech competitions across the country, such as the National Forensic League Sweepstakes, it seems as though The University of Akron School of Communication has not only over-looked, but punished those who exercised this technique.

Elizabeth Bedell, who is also in my Honors Introduction to Public Speaking class, contacted Bonnie Keiper, the coordinator, well in advance to confirm that the use of a brochure versus a PowerPoint would not hinder her score. Ms. Keiper responded that the lack of a PowerPoint would not harm her score. The night of the competition, however, Miss Bedell presented her brochures and was granted a 0/5 for visual aid accompanied by the comment “Must be tech.” Her score was compromised due to inconsistent information from the coordinator, which is unacceptable.

In addition, after giving my speech, the second judge proceeded to inform me that I have an incompetent professor who has failed me due to the fact that I was not taught how to give a speech off of a PowerPoint. Once again, this confirms my frustrations regarding the title of this event. Speeches are not to be given off of a PowerPoint. My professor, for whom I have the deepest respect, has taught me how to effectively and professionally deliver a well-prepared, well-organized speech. I was insulted that a faculty member was so blatantly offensive.

This being said, I have never been so disappointed in an organization. As students, we pay The University of Akron an expensive tuition because we trust the faculty and staff to provide us with a quality education. Due to the poor quality of the speeches, the far too loose definition of speech, inconsistent information and guidelines and the apathy of the staff, I left the competition questioning the credibility of the department.

Having an in-house speech competition is a great way for students to get involved with the School of Communication. However, from what was demonstrated from the contestants and staff, I am skeptical that the final five students selected to represent the School of Communication will positively represent The University of Akron.

The department has invested nearly $3,000 worth of prize money as an incentive to provide the best speakers to present to the public and therefore be exposed to press and potential students and faculty. I, as well as the other members from my Honors Introduction to Public Speaking course, am frustrated with the poor quality of the finalists.

For that reason, Miss Bedell would like to present her speech for you personally solely to receive your feedback. We hope this can further demonstrate the validity of our points that this competition was not for the speech giver, but the presenter.

I must thank you for taking the time to read and acknowledge our frustrations. We hope that this will not deter the department from hosting next year, but instead help improve the quality and relevancy of the competition.

Katharine Powell

View Comments (1)
More to Discover

Comments (1)

All comments that are well-informed, civil and relevant to the story are welcome. To leave a comment, please provide your name and email address. The Editorial Board reserves to right to remove any comment that is submitted under false pretenses or includes personal attacks, libel, hate speech, profanity, spam or inaccurate/misleading information. All comments are screened and are generally approved unless they are found to be found in violation of these standards. Readers who notice comments that appear to violate these standards are encouraged to contact the Online Editor at [email protected].
All The Buchtelite Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • N

    N.A.Apr 26, 2012 at 12:39 PM

    I saw Miss Powell’s speech, she did a very good job, but it seemed more like she was trying out for a play than giving a problem solution speech. I did not quite understand what she was trying to promote. In our class we were told to choose a problem that we could actually work to change in our daily lives. Her speech was not something that we could directly effect on our own without government intervention.